<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>London Theatre Blog &#187; Physical Theatre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/category/genres/physical-theatre-genres/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk</link>
	<description>Group authored publication covering theatre and the performing arts in London and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:53:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Borges and I</title>
		<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/borges-and-i/</link>
		<comments>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/borges-and-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Eglinton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physical Theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blindness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Luke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ellie Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grace Chapman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idle Motion Theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joel Gatehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jorge Borges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Spooner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Pitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Slater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sophie Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storytelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/?p=4602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Idle Motion's ability to transform a tiny, empty square into a detailed, textured and low-tech landscape of the imaginary, bodes well for future work with greater resources.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <em>Borges and I</em>, <a href="http://www.idlemotion.co.uk/Idle_Motion_Theatre_Company/Home.html" target="_blank">Idle Motion Theatre</a> mixes multiple narratives into a physical pastiche of the life and works of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jorge_Luis_Borges" target="_blank">Jorge Borges</a>. Taking on a literary heavyweight in just under an hour is a tall order by any company’s standards, and while the Oxford ensemble works animated wonders with its book-strewn stage, time and resources limit the piece to the cursory marks of the late author’s life.</p>
<p>The play’s focus is split between a thematic tour of an imagined Borges and the daily travails of young members in a present-day book club. The Argentine author is brought to life through a series of visual metaphors, frantically intercut with stark, film-like transitions. Among the vignettes are a wonderful torch and coat-made tiger, a book-built aeroplane fit for a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Little_Prince" target="_blank">Little Prince</a>, and in one of several nods to <a href="http://www.complicite.org/" target="_blank">Complicite</a>, a flight of paper birds. David Luke steps in and out of slow-motion movement pieces as a silent, foreboding Borges, meeting the audience head-on, while audio excerpts from key works add a secondary, philosophical layer to this bioplay. </p>
<p>The recurrent book club scenes, with their comedic and vernacular tone, are staged in a brightly lit semicircle that purposely disrupts the play’s poetic flow. It allows the group to tackle the Borgesian thematic from the point of view of the club members. Thus, Nick (Nick Pitt) falls in love with Sophie (Sophie Cullen) who soon after begins to lose her sight, placing a well-delivered, sombre slant on the hitherto unquestioned act and meaning of reading. Meanwhile Kate (Kate Stanley) is busy preparing for a life-changing job at the prestigious Bodleian library and uses the group as a sounding board for her trepidations.</p>
<p>The company’s strength is without doubt its tightly coordinated manipulation of space. The ability to transform a tiny, empty square into a detailed, textured and low-tech landscape of the imaginary, bodes well for future work with greater resources. Ambition and ideas are clearly not in short supply here. Where the production suffers is in its dealings with the literary legacy of Borges, which to me is of greater excitement and complexity than the well-noted biographical ‘truths’. This abundance of fertile, provocative writings, many of which have found new resonance in the Internet age, take an unsatisfying background stance in <em>Borges and I</em>.</p>
<p>&#8216;The library&#8217;, <a href="http://jubal.westnet.com/hyperdiscordia/library_of_babel.html" target="_blank">writes Borges</a>, &#8216;exists <em>ab aeterno</em>’ and defines ‘the future eternity of the world’. Eternity in an hour is asking the impossible, but a riskier, more intrepid journey into the matrix of a literary mind, his short stories for example, would certainly not go amiss. Watch out for Idle Motion Theatre this summer with their new show, <a href="http://www.idlemotion.co.uk/Idle_Motion_Theatre_Company/The_Vanishing_Horizon.html"><em>The Vanishing Horizon</em></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/borges-and-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Un/Familiar Fringe Episode Three: Un/Afraid</title>
		<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/unfamiliar-fringe-episode-three-unafraid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/unfamiliar-fringe-episode-three-unafraid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Boothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Edinburgh Fringe 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physical Theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flat screen TVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idle Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precarious Theatre Company]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/?p=3520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In part 3 of his Fringe round-up, Matt Boothman looks at the relationship between physical theatre and technology, highlighting <em>anomie</em> by Precarious and <em>Borges and I</em> by Idle Motion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The backstage adage about not relying too heavily on technology in the theatre holds particularly true at the Fringe. If your fancy audiovisual equipment can&#8217;t be trusted to work 100 per cent of the time in a purpose-built, professionally run space, then it definitely can&#8217;t be trusted in a temporarily converted lecture theatre staffed by enthusiastic volunteers.</p>
<p>And yet physical and multimedia company <a href="http://www.precarious.org.uk/" target="_blank">Precarious</a> continue to tempt fate and get away with it.  Like their 2008 triumph <em><a href="http://www.precarious.org.uk/p-factory.php?page=factory" target="_blank">The Factory</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.precarious.org.uk/p-anomie.php?page=anomie">anomie</a></em> is pure techie eye candy. Six giant <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-1')" title="click to expand/collapse slider flatscreen TVs">flatscreen TVs</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-1"></span> are the set and often parts of the performers, too, synchronising prerecorded and <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-2')" title="click to expand/collapse slider rotoscoped">rotoscoped</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-2"></span> footage with live movement so the cast can appear to <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-3')" title="click to expand/collapse slider fall">fall</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-3"></span> or <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-4')" title="click to expand/collapse slider step">step</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-4"></span> or <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-5')" title="click to expand/collapse slider crawl">crawl</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-5"></span> partially or fully inside the false-coloured world behind the screens. As if that wasn&#8217;t enough, precise projection onto gauze or plastic film creates eerily floating apparitions: flowers or shimmering green curtains of binary code. And it all works.</p>
<p>Unlike <em>The Factory</em>, however, <em>anomie</em>&#8217;s multimedia aspect limits, rather than enhances, its physical theatre aspect. There are too many long scenes of performers thrashing and squirming on mattresses with their heads inside television sets, and too few of the Gestic tableaux that made <em>The Factory</em> a statement, rather than a technical exercise. <em>Anomie</em> only comes close to equalling <em>The Factory</em>&#8217;s images of people packaged and stored like meat when it casts aside the screens in favour of tangible props, like the reams of <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-6')" title="click to expand/collapse slider shiny black videotape">shiny black videotape</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-6"></span> that entangle a camcorder voyeur, or the mattress through which two potential lovers blindly explore one another.</p>
<p>New physical theatre company <a href="http://www.idlemotion.co.uk/Idle_Motion.html" target="_blank">Idle Motion</a> embrace tangible props to create onstage imagery from the very beginning in their gentler, necessarily smaller-scale production <em>Borges and I</em>. Stacks of <a href="javascript:;" class="hackadelic-sliderButton"onclick="toggleSlider('#hackadelic-sliderPanel-7')" title="click to expand/collapse slider second-hand books">second-hand books</a> <span class="hackadelic-sliderPanel concealed" id="hackadelic-sliderPanel-7"></span> litter the stage, and their torn, clipped, punched, removed and rebound pages tumble out to form silhouetted skylines, or combine to represent an aeroplane, or stack to form a treacherous spiral staircase for Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges to stumble around as he gradually loses his sight.</p>
<p>The play is a tearjerker without being maudlin, and the inventive use of books and their pages as props, characters and scenery pieces is consistently surprising and delightful, whereas <em>anomie</em>&#8217;s invention, while undeniably technically masterful, soon becomes repetitive. Which just goes to show:  even if you can defy precedent and rely on your technology to work, you still can&#8217;t rely on it to carry your show for you.</p>
<div id="hackadelic-sliderNote-1" class="concealed"><p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/flatscreen.jpg" alt="Flat Screen Tvs in anomie by Precarious Theatre" width="500"/><br /><small>Flat Screen TVs on stage in <em>anomie</em> by Precarious Theatre</small></p>
<span style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; font-size: 0px"></span></div><div id="hackadelic-sliderNote-2" class="concealed"><p>
<p align="left"><em>&#8216;Rotoscoping, the process of manually tracing shapes through a captured image sequence, has become a central and critical part of creating computer-generated imagery (CGI). Nearly every modern ﬁlm with special effects involves copious rotoscoping, often consuming up to twenty percent of the human time required for a CGI project [Goldman 2003]. Rotoscoping is used in multiple ways. Frequently, it is used to create mattes to place an actor into a different scene; conversely, it can be used to replace a real prop with a CGI element. Rotoscoped mattes can be used to apply image ﬁlters selectively over parts of a video frame. Rotoscoping can also be used to create 2D animation from captured video, as in the recent ﬁlm, “Waking Life” [Linklater 2001]; indeed, rotoscoping was originally invented for just that purpose [Fleischer 1917]&#8216;</em></p>
<p><small> Excerpt from &#8216;Keyframe-Based Tracking for Rotoscoping and Animation&#8217; by Aseem Agarwala et al. University of Washington, 2004. <a href="http://grail.cs.washington.edu/projects/rotoscoping/roto.pdf" target="_blank">Source</a> &raquo;</small></p>
<span style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; font-size: 0px"></span></div><div id="hackadelic-sliderNote-3" class="concealed"><p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/fall.jpg" alt="Falling Into a Screen" width="500"/><br /><small>A performer &#8216;dives&#8217; into a screen in <em>anomie</em> by Precarious Theatre</small></p>
<span style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; font-size: 0px"></span></div><div id="hackadelic-sliderNote-4" class="concealed"><p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/stepping.jpg" alt="Stepping Into a Screen" width="500"/><small>A performer &#8217;steps&#8217; into a screen in <em>anomie</em> by Precarious Theatre</small></p>
<span style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; font-size: 0px"></span></div><div id="hackadelic-sliderNote-5" class="concealed"><p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/crawl.jpg" alt="Crawling into a Screen" width="500"/><br /><small>A performer &#8216;crawls&#8217; into a screen in <em>anomie</em> by Precarious Theatre</small></p>
<span style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; font-size: 0px"></span></div><div id="hackadelic-sliderNote-6" class="concealed"><p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/tape.jpg" alt="Shiny Black Videotape" width="500"/><br /><small>A performer entangled in shiny black videotape in <em>anomie</em> by Precarious Theatre</small></p>
<span style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; font-size: 0px"></span></div><div id="hackadelic-sliderNote-7" class="concealed"><p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/books.jpg" alt="Shiny Black Videotape" width="500"/><br /><small>Two performers read from second-hand books in <em>Borges and I</em> by Idle Motion</small></p>
<span style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; font-size: 0px"></span></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/unfamiliar-fringe-episode-three-unafraid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Macbeth: Who Is That Bloodied Man?</title>
		<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/macbeth-who-is-that-bloodied-man/</link>
		<comments>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/macbeth-who-is-that-bloodied-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Poonperm Paitayawat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physical Theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banquo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Macbeth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbeth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pawel Szkotak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southbank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Square2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teatr Biuro Podrozy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USSR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/?p=3138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can a Shakespearean play work without Shakespeare’s language? Pawel Szkotak proves so in his nightmarishly perverse adaptation of <em>Macbeth</em>. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best described as a masterpiece of Shakespearean physical theatre, <em>Macbeth: Who Is This Bloodied Man?</em> is a heavily trimmed down version of the original. Medieval Scotland is re-imagined as the USSR at the brink of its fall. There the crown is made from bullets—literally—but guns, alone, are not the instruments of power. Instead of staging a ‘straight’ translation of the text, Szkotak entices his audience with stunning visual imagery, almost void of the bard&#8217;s poetic language. Scenes are reshuffled, whilst some key phrases are spoken to facilitate the audience’s understanding of the plot.</p>
<p>Szkotak’s starting point, it seems, is the power struggle within a decaying kingdom. Political instability breeds fear as Duncan gnaws on his throne and shoots all the messengers who bring bad news, only to be relieved by the sight of a naked traitor in a cage. There is no report of Macbeth’s prowess. It soon becomes clear that the supernatural is the ultimate agent of change. The witches in the guise of nuns and with extended wooden legs glide into the performance space lighting the torches and preparing a welcoming ritual for Macbeth and Banquo. The witches’ prophesies are not only re-enacted as grotesque fantasies; they hover between the real and the un-real. For instance, there’s a scene in which kings line up and tower over Banquo, followed by a boy rolling a king’s crown on the ground. The images merge when the boy later appears as Banquo’s son.</p>
<p>Recurrent images, such as the bullet crown, the boy, the guns, the logs, and the extended wooden legs, become symbolic of Macbeth’s mental state of captivity. The themes of fatalism, entrapment, claustrophobic violence and psychological trauma, are very well played out especially toward the end. Seeking prophesies from the witches, Macbeth is cornered and crushed by a gigantic steel wheel filled with severed heads. Soon after, encroached and overpowered by ‘Birnam Wood’, Macbeth is startled back into the blazing castle where he is burnt to ashes on his throne.</p>
<p>Szkotak’s tactics, made possible by the intimate ambiance of Square2, the National Theatre’s temporary outdoor venue on the Southbank, are to shock and petrify his audience by graphic violence accentuated by sound and manipulation of light. Be it Banquo being hammered to death by burning torches or Lady Macbeth hanging herself, the excruciating horror is within the audience’s reach, as if one could jump in and put an end to it. With Shakespeare’s text replaced by non-verbal, raw and gory action, the adaptation stops one from sympathising with the hero. Szkotak’s Macbeth is no longer a tragedy but a story of an ambitious murderer who is met with a deserving end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/macbeth-who-is-that-bloodied-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

