Eonnagata

Eonnagata is a diffuse, episodic and sometimes meandering meditation upon identity and gender, with moments of painful intensity interspersed with passages of narrative obscurity.

In Eonnagata three maverick performers join forces in pursuit of an elusive historical enigma. Sylvie Guillem, Robert Lepage and Russell Maliphant, the show’s co-creators, all play the Chevalier d’Éon in different phases and aspects of his/her scandalous international career. Combining Kabuki-inspired dance-drama, physical theatre and technical wizardry, Eonnagata explores the multiple personalities and personae of the diplomat, spy and infamous cross-dresser who fooled Catherine the Great, but was eventually trapped by her/his own virtuosic masquerade.

Alexander McQueen’s costumes provide a fluidly sculptural playground, where fan-play fuses with swordplay, and the sartorial formalities of Louis Quinze and traditional Kabuki collide. Maliphant births himself from the cocoon of a golden kimono, only to be re-absorbed by its rapaciously sensuous embrace. Guillem has a thrilling solo in which letter-writing becomes duelling, her long Japanese sleeves first doing duty as parchment, then whirling though the air in desperate billows of self-concealment. The slow-motion sequence in which her male-garbed Chevalier is forcibly parted from her masculine attire and identity is harrowing in its poignant simplicity. Lepage is noticeably and inevitably slow-footed by comparison with his co-creators when all three dance in unison, but alone he moves with commanding grace, inhabiting the crumbling facade of the ageing d’Éon with paradoxical dignity and gravitas.

A set of screens keeps re-enacting Jove’s vengeful severance of the sexes, sundering partners as well as scenes, and sometimes fracturing the show’s subtle chain of allusive symbols in the process. Some passages of monologue also obtrude inelegantly, curtailing as well as illuminating the possible meanings of d’Éon’s convoluted biography (especially since they aren’t always wholly audible from the higher levels of the theatre).

Eonnagata is a diffuse, episodic and sometimes meandering meditation upon identity and gender, with moments of painful intensity interspersed with passages of narrative obscurity. The closing movement of the drama, in which d’Éon’s reflection upon his/her own life is playfully relayed through some magical mirror trickery, lends a welcome coherence to a stylish, beguiling and courageous, if occasionally bewildering, creative collaboration.

  • Stephe Harrop
    @ Katia - Some of what you're saying is hard to disagree with. But, equally, long may the theatre remain a place for being "hoodwinked, seduced and wooed".
  • Katia Hilel
    I don't know what Robert Lepage was thinking with this show. Is 2009 the year of lackluster cultural pot-pourri or is this the way of the world now? England People Very Nice at the National. Ninagawa's self-orientalist Kabuki Twelfth Night extravaganza at the Barbican. Eonnagata at Sadler's Wells and countless others I'm sure.

    How complacent have we become with the isms of the 60's and 70's; orientalism, feminism, biological determinism, interculturalism etc etc. Regardless of whether you identify with the markers we choose to flag social and political consciousness. The important thing is that it exists and that it's alive and breathing, not hidden under a layer of cultural pot-pourri, or under a sheet of collective laughter.

    In 2009 we're supposed to be 'culturally mobile'. No longer spectators of cultural phenomena, but proponents of it. But does this mean we just go out in the world, think of it as our playground, and take from it the colours that we need to create an artistic mess?

    Slapping one culture on top of another, an artistic discipline here and a theatre tradition there, like a great big trifle? For the next cultural icon to fill the great void that is Tate Modern, I propose a giant Trifle, and yes, we all get to stick our spoons in it!.

    Where's the urgency in cross cultural negotiation? Russia, China, India, South America, Africa. The fault lines abound. Mass migratory trends. Water/Food supplies. World resource strategy, Deforestation. The rape of the environment. Why are cultural producers in 2009 still settling for the old men's club and their vision of the world? I'm sorry Robert Lepage, Yukio Ninagawa and Nicholas Hytner, but you are part of the old men's club.

    We live in times where the individual has never been more powerful. We have information sources at our fingertips. Technology that can translate our desires into actions. We can self organise, self publicise, and yet still we go to the theatre to be hoodwinked, seduced and wooed by sedentary sillyness.

    What about a theatre that's alive and breathing? One in which audience, actors, director and crew are all working together. Conscious, focused and determined to put the wrongs right rather than pontificating, rather than succumbing to the spectacle and its inebriating effect.

    Social theatre projects are nothing new. They've been done before. Isn't it time to try something large scale again? Working with the technological and scientific paradigms of the moment? I'm not talking about a revolution. I'm not talking about Socialism. I'm talking about giving a shit. Taking responsibility of the power that was bequeathed to us by our ancestors. This is a time for action. For collaboration. A time to take things into our own hands, because we are the generation that can.

    Stop consuming art for art's sake. Put art to work. Engage people. Get people involved. Not in the back room of some community arts pilot scheme, but in large scale institutions, smack bang in middle class England. Don't alienate people from art as it were some sort of sacred entity. Smash the glass museum cases. Down with cultural meritocracy and the institutions that uphold it. Fuck Arts Council 'impact', 'excellence' and all their other indeterminate acts of party political prostitution. We've graduated. It's taken millennia of struggle, but we're finally there. We're responsible now. There's no looking back.
  • David Gifford
    I found this production very disappointing. It seemed to attempt too much and deliver very little - and there seemed to be an air of self-congratulatory indulgence hanging heavily over the whole enterprise. Only the stunning costumes and lighting of Alexander McQueen and Michael Hull, respectively, were clearly and brilliantly conceived. The rest had a real feeling of "work in progress" and of artists uncomfortable with their role.

    Lepage is, without doubt, one of the great stage directors of the 20th/21st century but he is a self-conscious and rather clumsy actor - and doesn't move well. The vaudeville-like section with the hoop and stick, for example, was embarrassingly awful and Lepage looked very self-conscious. Whilst it is important for art to experiment and push boundaries, it is also necessary to be aware of one's limitations - especially if foisting it onto the paying public.

    The conflicting male-female personas of Chevalier d'Eon gave exciting possibilities for danced duets between Guillem and Maliphant, exploring sexual identities, but, disappointingly, it rarely happened. When the main expressive language of these two artists is dance then why didn't they use that language much more instead us giving us stilted and generally poorly delivered sequences of text or passages of generally slow movement that a) offered little comment on the extraordinary nature of d'Eon's character and b) showed a superficial response to the magnificently stylised artistry of Kabuki which is full of dramatic tension and controlled energy. This was Japan as vacuous window dressing.

    A few sequences combined dance and visual imagery very excitingly, such as Guillem's sequence with the pen/sword. Others - such as the endless sliding along, and jumping over, tables, were more reminiscent of student excercises and it was difficult to read their relevence to the theme of the work.

    Perhaps it is time to have some kind of rating that indicates the amount of dialogue and acting that features in what most audiences might reasonably expect to be dance pieces (I refer not only to this but to the recent work of William Forsythe, for example). Are modern choreographers loosing confidence in the power of pure dance to explore and communicate ideas and emotions?
  • Alex C
    Wow

    Very well put by author and commenter.
    Possibly too well put - certainly more than it deserved.
    I've just come back from wasting 90 minutes at this execrable production.
    While the lighting was excellent and the music and costumes were fine, the rest was dreadful. There's no interval principally because the second half would have been empty. Desperately pompous and trite passages are read out by the performers and are followed by a scene that may be, but usually isn't, relevant. To call them dances would be pushing it a bit far, usually they just wandered around the stage for a while, or slid around tables for no good reason. As for the mirror dance - it was utterly uninspired and reminded me of games we used to play at playschool.

    They attempted to use martial arts, and failed utterly. Frankly an afternoon spent in any of the fifty or so competent dojos in town might have made some parts of this less painful to watch.

    Definitely one to avoid - you'll only encourage them by going and that wouldn't be kind.

Info and Credits

Eonnagata is at Sadler’s Wells until 8 March: see their website for more information.

See a video clip of the production here.

Recent posts by Stephe Harrop

Recent Reviews

Sort posts by

TheatreinPictures


Theatre in Pictures »

Resources

Practical theatre links, scholarly resources, maps, podcasts, cheap tickets & more.
See resource page »

Recent Comments