<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Event Horizon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/event-horizon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/event-horizon/</link>
	<description>Group authored publication covering theatre and the performing arts in London and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/event-horizon/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londontheatreblog.co.uk/event-horizon/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Joseph meant that the figures seemed to have been sent to watch and look out over London, rather than to be a part of it, which is a situation which many Londoners will empathise with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Joseph meant that the figures seemed to have been sent to watch and look out over London, rather than to be a part of it, which is a situation which many Londoners will empathise with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Eglinton</title>
		<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/event-horizon/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Eglinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 12:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londontheatreblog.co.uk/event-horizon/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>@Joseph Edwards. Thanks for your comment. To get a discussion going it would be helpful if you could elaborate on your point about voyeurism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joseph Edwards. Thanks for your comment. To get a discussion going it would be helpful if you could elaborate on your point about voyeurism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/event-horizon/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 09:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londontheatreblog.co.uk/event-horizon/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I disagree with Rachel. Quote &quot;the figures were obviously simultaneously isolated and part of a grander scheme; the same goes for the people looking at them&quot;. Not really true. And what about voyeurism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with Rachel. Quote &#8220;the figures were obviously simultaneously isolated and part of a grander scheme; the same goes for the people looking at them&#8221;. Not really true. And what about voyeurism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shakeel</title>
		<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/event-horizon/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Shakeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 02:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://londontheatreblog.co.uk/event-horizon/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I know what you mean, I saw them take down Gormleys sculptures, and I thought it was a real shame because they looked a part of the city skyline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you mean, I saw them take down Gormleys sculptures, and I thought it was a real shame because they looked a part of the city skyline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
