Home » Reviews, Royal Court

Now or Later

18 September 2008 Written by Matt BoothmanPrint This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post
Now or Later

Christopher Shinn has so much to say about American politics, Islam, homosexuality, freedom of expression and life in the public eye that his play Now Or Later, at the Royal Court until 18 October, can barely contain it all. Its brittle naturalistic structure regularly ruptures, issuing jets of superheated opinion direct from the playwright’s mind through the characters’ mouths.

Luckily - or rather, shrewdly on Shinn’s part - the play’s setting neatly excuses this kind of soapbox declamation. It takes place on US presidential election night, in a hotel room occupied by the Democrat candidate’s son, John Jr. It’s a politically charged environment inhabited by politically eloquent people (campaign staff and the potential President’s immediate family), so informed debates about the issues du jour are realistic, if not always totally theatrical.

Now or Later Production Image BottomThe tangents at which the play’s many debates diverge look suspiciously like excuses for Shinn to hawk his many (and considered) political theories to the audience, but they’re interwoven in a way that suggests the personal is political, the political can border on religious, the religious is personal and issues from domestic disputes to public relations to party politics to the Middle East to Islam to Christian fundamentalism to Evangelism to literalism to homophobia and back again are so tightly knotted together that discussion of one will inevitably lead to debates on all the rest. Every tangent is painstakingly anchored in the point from which it branches; politics, Shinn seems to say, cannot help but cover every one of these issues and more. It’s impossible to discuss one topic in isolation. What matters is how it fits into the big picture.

The production has been timed to coincide with the real Presidential race, but benefits also from some serendipitous parallels with real life. The controversial Danish cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad feature heavily and risk dating the play considerably; but they’re mentioned in relation to John Jr’s indiscretions at a college party, evoking Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin’s own filial improprieties in ways Shinn could not possibly have foreseen, but which add immediacy to an already consciously topical production.

All seats at the Royal Court http://www.royalcourttheatre.com cost £10 on a Monday; concessions (£5 off top price) are available on other days. Now Or Later ends 18 October.

Image Top: Eddie Redmayne in Now or Later at the Royal Court Theatre. Photograph by Keith Pattison.

Image Bottom: Matthew Marsh and Eddie Redmayne in Now or Later at the Royal Court Theatre. Photograph by Keith Pattison.

3 Comments »

  • Stephen Pitchers said:

    Wonderfully insightful and topical production, I thought! Only frustration was with the son’s college friend, Matt. At times the character seemed a little too useful to the play. The soapbox was masked brilliantly through the action, but occasionally I thought it could be found in him. Bit of a planted stooge maybe?

    They’ve extended the run till 1 Novermber by the way!

  • Matt Boothman (author) said:

    I thought all the characters were guilty of planted stooge syndrome at times - each one had a discrete opinion to impart to John Jr, so every time a new character appeared Shinn had an excuse to attack his pet issues from a slightly different angle until every aspect had been exhaustively debated. I enjoyed hearing everything the characters had to say, and they were all vital contemporary issues, so it’s brilliant that they could be aired on stage in such detail and through such accessible characters, but I thought it just teetered into didacticism in places.

    It’s fantastic that they’ve extended the run - I’ve been recommending the play to friends without being totally sure it’s still running!

  • Stephen Pitchers said:

    Didacticism, most definitely. Both for him and for us! I suppose the fine line that the play sat on was somewhere between stirring entertainment and an ethics lesson. I thought the best moment - and when the line was most evident - was when his political, righteous intention was undercut with what most people would see as some good old, juvenile college banter. An intellectually-charged dildo? Well I never…

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.