Peter Pan

Grafting a social conscience onto Barrie’s blithely heartless hero isn’t as easy as re-attaching lost shadows.

Regular readers may have noticed my tendency to write about Peter Pan at any available opportunity (including here and here). So I hope you won’t take it as deliberate waywardness that the National Theatre of Scotland’s new Pan made me think of nothing so much as Kneehigh’s Cymbeline. The story’s (just about) there – but what on earth has happened to the words?

David Greig’s new version for the National Theatre of Scotland aims to repatriate J.M. Barrie’s classic tale to Edinburgh, strategically roughening the play’s edges in the process. So these Darling children are subjected to an educational viewing of a work-in-progress Forth Bridge, where a tribe of ragged boys swagger and swoop among the ironwork , while their engineer father fumes over each second wasted (tick tock, tick tock).

Laura Hopkins’ design splashes lurid, fantastical sunsets against the steely lattice of the unfinished bridge, effortlessly showing what Greig’s script laboriously strives to explain. Her wondrous transformation of this imposing silhouette makes Neverland an anarchic, shadowy subversion of stifling Victorian industriousness, where a lichen-covered stone beehive (with some distinctly magical properties) banishes all hankerings after tradition’s prim Wendy house.

The show also teems with traditional music, work-songs and sea-shanties and hauntingly sad lullabies, a melancholy sound-scape (arranged by Davey Anderson) in sombre contrast to the young cast’s apparently boundless energy. A gasp-inducing Tinker Bell (reincarnated as a bad-tempered ball of fire), Peter’s casual defiance of gravity and some viscerally exciting flying all make a pretty strong case for believing in fairies – though it sometimes seems that the author would prefer it if we didn’t.

Greig’s rewriting of Barrie’s insouciant prose seems determined to spell out what the older play left unspoken, but too often only manages to replace shimmering sentimentality with well-intentioned banality. His re-imagining of Wendy as a stroppy proto-feminist (shades of Pirates of the Caribbean) is occasionally wince-inducing, and making loveable Smee into a gauntly laconic fiddle-player leaves Cal MacAninch’s Hook (a tattooed, kilted hard-man, who definitely didn’t go to Eton) with nobody much to talk to.

Thank goodness Wendy’s last bedtime story survives more or less intact, along with Peter’s tragically un-punctual return to the nursery. The old play’s magic flickers intermittently, but grafting a social conscience onto Barrie’s blithely heartless hero apparently isn’t as easy as re-attaching lost shadows.


A scene from the NTS production of Peter Pan. Photo by Manuel Harlan.


Cal MacAninch as Hook in the NTS production of Peter Pan. Photo by Manuel Harlan.

  • I don't think he's been able to shake off the impact of that iconic
    show on his work. I found myself waiting for squaddies to parachute in
    and take hook out with a round of rifle fire.
  • Peter Pan is a child classic and it should stay like that.
  • Woody
    Hook can fly! Er, no. Hook doesn't fly. Tiger Lily as two half human half wolves? No. Hook taking the honourable way out? No. Peter as a self obsessed egocentric? Of course. Wendy in a basque? Fair enough.
  • Rob McKinley
    I saw this at the King's Theatre in Glasgow and was really excited at the prospect of John Tiffany's next major production since the incredible Black Watch. The problem is, I don't think he's been able to shake off the impact of that iconic show on his work. I found myself waiting for squaddies to parachute in and take hook out with a round of rifle fire. Adding grit to Pan is like *really* sending Santa Claus down an unswept chimney: you just don't want the childhood spell to be broken. But that's probably all my fault, because my kids were having a whale of a time and now we're reading the book at bedtime...so now I get to *direct* the show :) Thanks for the review.
  • Not sure...
    Err...I'm not sure sort of parent takes their kids to an adult version of Peter Pan? And I'm not sure you actually saw the show...
  • Rob McKinley
    Sounds like someone was having a bad day...venting frustration in blog comment sections is never a good remedy though.

    In any case, I'd definitely recommend the show to anyone thinking of taking the family - to anyone at all for that matter.
  • Stephe Harrop
    Just for the record, the NTS website says "Peter Pan is ideal for the young at heart aged 7 and over".

Info and Credits

Peter Pan is at the Barbican until 29 May 2010, then continues touring.

For tickets and further information, visit the Barbican Theatre website

Watch the NTS video trailer.

Cover photo by Manuel Harlan.

Recent posts by Stephe Harrop

Recent Reviews

Sort posts by

TheatreinPictures


Theatre in Pictures »

Resources

Practical theatre links, scholarly resources, maps, podcasts, cheap tickets & more.
See resource page »

Recent Comments