<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shun-kin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/shun-kin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/shun-kin/</link>
	<description>Group authored publication covering theatre and the performing arts in London and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:24:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Eglinton</title>
		<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/shun-kin/#comment-2590</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Eglinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/?p=951#comment-2590</guid>
		<description>Welcome to London Theatre Blog. Thanks for taking the time to comment. The three reviews you&#039;re referring to are as follows (thought it might be helpful to post the links):

- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2009/feb/06/review-shunkin-barbican&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lyn Gardner&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s review.
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/reviews/shunkin-barbican-london-1604331.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Michael Coveney&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s review.
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/4528359/Shun-Kin-at-the-Barbican-review.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Charles Spencer&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to London Theatre Blog. Thanks for taking the time to comment. The three reviews you&#8217;re referring to are as follows (thought it might be helpful to post the links):</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2009/feb/06/review-shunkin-barbican" rel="nofollow">Lyn Gardner</a>&#8217;s review.<br />
- <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/reviews/shunkin-barbican-london-1604331.html" rel="nofollow">Michael Coveney</a>&#8217;s review.<br />
- <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/4528359/Shun-Kin-at-the-Barbican-review.html" rel="nofollow">Charles Spencer</a>&#8217;s review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katia Hilel</title>
		<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/shun-kin/#comment-2581</link>
		<dc:creator>Katia Hilel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/?p=951#comment-2581</guid>
		<description>Hello, I found this blog as I was searching for resources on Complicité. I was very impressed! I didn&#039;t see the London version of Shun-Kin but I did see the one in Tokyo. The UK criticism has been very naive in my opinion. I read Lyn Gardner, Michael Coveney and Charles Spencer reviews - all seemed happy to base their opinions on cultural clichés. My feeling is that most thinkers have acknowledged and overcome orientalism in the 21st century, but the critics still reduce their readings of this production to binaries of &#039;us and them&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I found this blog as I was searching for resources on Complicité. I was very impressed! I didn&#8217;t see the London version of Shun-Kin but I did see the one in Tokyo. The UK criticism has been very naive in my opinion. I read Lyn Gardner, Michael Coveney and Charles Spencer reviews &#8211; all seemed happy to base their opinions on cultural clichés. My feeling is that most thinkers have acknowledged and overcome orientalism in the 21st century, but the critics still reduce their readings of this production to binaries of &#8216;us and them&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

