<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Electric Ballroom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/the-new-electric-ballroom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/the-new-electric-ballroom/</link>
	<description>Group authored publication covering theatre and the performing arts in London and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/the-new-electric-ballroom/#comment-3091</link>
		<dc:creator>jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/?p=1237#comment-3091</guid>
		<description>I agree. It should have been marketed with a different focus and what a great idea for it to be made into a play for radio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. It should have been marketed with a different focus and what a great idea for it to be made into a play for radio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Boothman</title>
		<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/the-new-electric-ballroom/#comment-2979</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Boothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/?p=1237#comment-2979</guid>
		<description>I really didn&#039;t expect to like this.  Slow-burn potboilers ordinarily bore me rigid, and everything I&#039;d heard or read about it, both at the Fringe and since, had me convinced it was a slow-burn potboiler.  I think it&#039;s strange that the publicity material doesn&#039;t make more of the surrealist/absurdist elements, which, to me, were what made the play stand out (that and Walsh&#039;s script, but it was SO wordy and SO static in places that I found myself thinking it would work better as a radio play).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really didn&#8217;t expect to like this.  Slow-burn potboilers ordinarily bore me rigid, and everything I&#8217;d heard or read about it, both at the Fringe and since, had me convinced it was a slow-burn potboiler.  I think it&#8217;s strange that the publicity material doesn&#8217;t make more of the surrealist/absurdist elements, which, to me, were what made the play stand out (that and Walsh&#8217;s script, but it was SO wordy and SO static in places that I found myself thinking it would work better as a radio play).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
