<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Un/Familiar Fringe Episode Two: Un/Seated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/unfamiliar-fringe-episode-two-unseated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/unfamiliar-fringe-episode-two-unseated/</link>
	<description>Group authored publication covering theatre and the performing arts in London and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:24:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julien Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/unfamiliar-fringe-episode-two-unseated/#comment-5799</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.londontheatreblog.co.uk/?p=3486#comment-5799</guid>
		<description>sorry that having no time for reading the article carefully - 

i´m on plays -------- 

immersion means the audience is transformed from an explicit view to an implicit view (i write view - not point of view) - so, the control (YES !!) wanders from the consciousness of the audience to the makers of production - the audience itself is stunned to a kind of subconsciousness - control here means there´s no control from the audience side of view related to the stage - the author (makers, producers) becomes a force of immanence within the audience - so, there´s no real mutual relation anymore - this escapes the audience because the audience is within a realm of the implicit - the audience is unable to translate this situation into one of the explicit - 

the embaressment factor - is another form of control - the explicit escapes the &quot;victim&quot; - and... but... it´s a technic to enforce the &quot;victim´s&quot; body control - the &quot;victim&quot; shifts to tacit body knowledge - seeks to play out a routine - so this leads not really to participation - (it´s the same old story john cage had with the order of the chairs for one of his audiences - the audience reshaped an order that wasn´t intended - the chairs stood disordered - the audience tends to seek for a known form - 50 per cent of the audience left the show in the beginning - why - the loudspeakers had been set to the disordered form - this disordered form related to the sonic here is completely different from using headphones nowadays - here is no kind of immersion - it´s -ok- a kind of embaressment - it´s a little part brechtian ?? - why - here the audience has to get the explicit to understand the show - that´s what i intended to say about mark´s current reviews)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry that having no time for reading the article carefully &#8211; </p>
<p>i´m on plays &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; </p>
<p>immersion means the audience is transformed from an explicit view to an implicit view (i write view &#8211; not point of view) &#8211; so, the control (YES !!) wanders from the consciousness of the audience to the makers of production &#8211; the audience itself is stunned to a kind of subconsciousness &#8211; control here means there´s no control from the audience side of view related to the stage &#8211; the author (makers, producers) becomes a force of immanence within the audience &#8211; so, there´s no real mutual relation anymore &#8211; this escapes the audience because the audience is within a realm of the implicit &#8211; the audience is unable to translate this situation into one of the explicit &#8211; </p>
<p>the embaressment factor &#8211; is another form of control &#8211; the explicit escapes the &#8220;victim&#8221; &#8211; and&#8230; but&#8230; it´s a technic to enforce the &#8220;victim´s&#8221; body control &#8211; the &#8220;victim&#8221; shifts to tacit body knowledge &#8211; seeks to play out a routine &#8211; so this leads not really to participation &#8211; (it´s the same old story john cage had with the order of the chairs for one of his audiences &#8211; the audience reshaped an order that wasn´t intended &#8211; the chairs stood disordered &#8211; the audience tends to seek for a known form &#8211; 50 per cent of the audience left the show in the beginning &#8211; why &#8211; the loudspeakers had been set to the disordered form &#8211; this disordered form related to the sonic here is completely different from using headphones nowadays &#8211; here is no kind of immersion &#8211; it´s -ok- a kind of embaressment &#8211; it´s a little part brechtian ?? &#8211; why &#8211; here the audience has to get the explicit to understand the show &#8211; that´s what i intended to say about mark´s current reviews)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

